I Have A Little Problem . . .

Class was great last night -- I enjoyed it. It was good (any dissenting opinions? No? C'mon, I know there is.). Nan commented that afterwards she felt like she had been recreating (as in recreation) -- and I must agree, the mental exercise pumped me up physically as if I had been using my muscles for more than Herman Göring impressions (Goering for all you Germanically impaired) or sticking my hand up Aristotle's dress.

But I have a problem. I want to accept Aristotle's words, but cannot at this point. I'll keep trying, and that's what this post is . . . an attempt to let you all get a little further into my head so you can figure out where I'm going astray.

I can totally agree with everything Aristotle has said to this point . . . everything. All that needs be done is birth me into the elite class. As long as I am elite, and there are rational reasons to maintain my natural born eliteness . . . I can agree with Aristotle on his whole scheme of virtues and vices.

Of course, looking at two vicious extremes is very much the way to find the good path . . . if you're elite. It gets a little harder when you're not . . . elite, that is. Y'see . . . if I'm elite, then somebody else has to be at the vicious extremes . . . and all along the spectrum of viciousness . . . for me to see and rationalize my path through the viciousness and onto the path of virtue, that leads ever upward to The Good. It certainly wouldn't do for me, an elite, to actually go out there and experience those vicious extremes . . . that's the job of the vulgar people -- those poor unfortunates who, try as they will, can never attain a life of virtue. It's their job to mark the path for the elites. The only reason an elite treads those vicious paths is through temporary ignorance.

"See, my brothers and sisters," saith one Elite to a magnificent assemblage of (male) humanity, "truely these lowborn are merely facsimiles of us. Their actions and desires are like unto the animals. Emotions toss their insignificant lives onto the rocks of vice so we can see the dangers therein. That is their purpose -- to show us where not to go. Let them flounder, it's what they do best. They would never be happy living our lives . . . they just don't understand. They can't comprehend. They don't realize!"

No way, José!

First of all . . . I do not claim high birth (though maybe, just maybe, in my wildest dreams, I'm related to that Edward, The Black Prince), nor do I claim an intellect as good as Aristotle or his colleagues. I am guilty of emotional excesses & rational deficiencies and rational excesses & emotional deficiencies, and will continue to have an abundance of emotional & rational escapades and rational & emotional lapses. I stand guilty of some of the most heinous of crimes, and have been duly punished (not as much as I should have been . . . but that's another story, one about Justice). I have hurt people; both those who deserved to be hurt and those who deserved naught but kindness from me. I can hurt you. Ain't nobody immune.

I reject any person's authority over me. I reject the notion that the elites are naturally sane and rational, and the unwashed masses are naturally handicapped in some way(s) mental, emotional, spiritual or physical. I reject the notion that animals are less than humans -- more correctly, I reject the notion that humans are more than animals. I reject a whole hell of a lot, actually. But I also accept a whole lot more than any group of elites will ever accept.

I accept that every human can be virtuous, and end up living a virtuous life even if they're crazy (Hey, Francis of Assisi, you really oughta stop flagellating yourself naked in the snow!). I accept that there are humans who are evil -- I've met a few, and the feeling (yes, Aristotle, FEELING, EMOTION) is immediately communicated, recognizable and palpable, undeniable and frightening. These evil people I have met have been the most coldly calculating, rational humans I have ever encountered. Do not make the mistake I speak of people without feelings . . . oh no . . . these evil people I've met certainly did have the full range of feelings we all have. That's the most scary part. You can see it all in their eyes (yes you can, Aristotle) as they take your measure, figure out what pleasure you can be to them, and weigh the enjoyment of your pain against possible consequences.

Evil.

Evil is real. Evil is in all of us.

I accept that even these most evil of people can find the virtuous human within them. Believe me, I've ran with gangs, lived in maximum/medium/minimum security prisons and met the whole range . . . on a personal and intimate long-term basis. I have wasted the days, weeks, months and even years away with winos, bums, schizophrenics, manic-depressives, obsessive-compulsives, anorexics, bulemics, common drunks, the shell-shocked and common & uncommon criminals, etcetera (even a catatonic . . . during my time in the nut house). I have counted among my friends: murderers, child molesters, rapists, bank robbers, muggers, gangbangers, women-beaters, gay bashers, felons & punks of all descriptions, prostitutes, drug dealers, pious religious fanatics and even a bona-fide Mafioso. I can count numerous victims of the above people (including the religious victims) as my friends as well. I have been both victim and perpetrator, perpetrator and victim. I have done bad things, even evil things -- and I knew what I was doing when I did them. I expect everybody knows when they are doing bad things -- don't give me no shit about involuntary or nonvoluntary actions, or even acting out of ignorance. That ain't it. That's an excuse for the elites. You know. Period.

Oh, in case anyone is worried . . . I have been punished (or excused) for all the crimes I have committed the state recognizes. I am not a wanted man. I have paid my debts to society . . . have you? Leave that be. This is philosophy here. Philosophy of the Ordinary Life.

Be honest -- you know, and actually decide and like, the things you do that are, shall we say, not exactly virtuous. Don't you? I do. Is anyone gonna say I am extraordinary? Pshaw! I am so pissin' ordinary you can hang a sign on me -- Typical Specimen of the Unwashed Masses. I've got the past to prove it. Ain't nowhere I hung around with anyone special, anyone better, anyone super, anyone worse, anyone different. I've seen a lot of humans, even a few born-elites up close and personal as friends, and all were readily recognizable by their actions as ordinary humans. None looked at me any differently. OK, maybe some did, but it wasn't with awe, I can tell you that much.

We all feel the same to me. Am I wrong?

If I'm right, then there is a way to reach everyone who is capable of performing the basic necessities of survival -- there is a way for each of us to find the path to a virtuous life. If there isn't . . . if virtue is just for the elite . . . I don't want no part of it. I like the people I've met in the unwashed masses. I understand them. I am one of them.

So . . . why does looking at two vicious extremes to find the virtuous mean unsettle me? Maybe because I've been out there on the extremes . . . and lemme tell ya, ain't no different from the mean. It's still about viciousness, not virtue. And besides . . . I found some of the best and goodest, kindest and caring, intelligent and wise, people suffering out there on the extremes of vice. I'll not leave them behind no matter what rules Aristotle or anyone else lays down . . . including your god.

I Don't Want To Be Magnificent!

LA ASOCIACIÓN MADRES DE PLAZA DE MAYO

Isn't it painfully obvious that maniacs are in control of our society? Isn't it painfully obvious that we suffer like ignorant, cowardly slaves? Isn't it painfully obvious that we hate each other? Isn't it painfully obvious we care only for our own comfort? Isn't it painfully obvious that male magnificence is a rich man's lie? Isn't it painfully obvious we never listened to our mothers? Isn't it painfully obvious we love being vicious? Isn't it painfully obvious that we need to be punished?

You can keep your magnificence. I'd rather hug my grandmother.

The Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo
http://www.madres.org/
http://www.labournet.net/world/0001/mum1.html
http://www.easybuenosairescity.com/biografias/madres1.htm
http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=36444

Where These Magnificent Women Go
http://www.tribuna.islagrande.cu/patriotas/opini/adondei.htm

Plaza de Mayo
http://www.moon.com/planner/argentina/mustsee/plaza_mayo.html

Socrates Is Dead, Long Live Socrates!

On this day, some say, in 399 BC the philosopher Socrates stood before a jury of 500 of his fellow Athenians accused and judged of refusing to recognize the gods recognized by the state and of corrupting the youth.“The greatest way to live with honor in this world
is to be what we pretend to be.”

[Plato, Meno]
[96c]
Socrates

And if there are no teachers, there can be no disciples either?

Meno

I think that statement is true.

Socrates

And we have admitted that a thing of which there are neither teachers nor disciples cannot be taught?

Meno

We have.

Socrates

So nowhere are any teachers of virtue to be found?

Meno

That is so.

Socrates

And if no teachers, then no disciples?

Meno

So it appears.

Socrates

Hence virtue cannot be taught?

[96d]

Meno

It seems likely, if our investigation is correct. And that makes me wonder, I must say, Socrates, whether perhaps there are no good men at all, or by what possible sort of process good people can come to exist?

Socrates

I fear, Meno, you and I are but poor creatures, and Gorgias has been as faulty an educator of you as Prodicus of me. So our first duty is to look to ourselves, and try to find somebody who will have some means or other of making us better. [96e] I say this with special reference to our recent inquiry, in which I see that we absurdly failed to note that it is not only through the guidance of knowledge that human conduct is right and good; and it is probably owing to this that we fail to perceive by what means good men can be produced.

Meno

To what are you alluding, Socrates?

Socrates
I mean that good men must be useful: we were right, were we not, in admitting that [97a] this must needs be so?

Meno

Yes.

Socrates

And in thinking that they will be useful if they give us right guidance in conduct: here also, I suppose, our admission was correct?

Meno

Yes.

Socrates

But our assertion that it is impossible to give right guidance unless one has knowledge looks very like a mistake.

Meno

What do you mean by that?

Socrates

I will tell you. If a man knew the way to Larisa, or any other place you please, and walked there and led others, would he not give right and good guidance?

Meno

Certainly.

[97b]

Socrates

Well, and a person who had a right opinion as to which was the way, but had never been there and did not really know, might give right guidance, might he not?

Meno

Certainly.

Socrates

And so long, I presume, as he has right opinion about that which the other man really knows, he will be just as good a guide--if he thinks the truth instead of knowing it--as the man who has the knowledge.

Meno

Just as good.

Socrates

Hence true opinion is as good a guide to rightness of action as knowledge; and this is a point we omitted just now in our consideration of the nature of virtue, [97c] when we stated that knowledge is the only guide of right action; whereas we find there is also true opinion.

Meno

So it seems.

Socrates

Then right opinion is just as useful as knowledge.

Meno

With this difference, Socrates, that he who has knowledge will always hit on the right way, whereas he who has right opinion will sometimes do so, but sometimes not.

Socrates

How do you mean? Will not he who always has right opinion be always right, so long as he opines rightly?

Meno

It appears to me that he must; and therefore I wonder, Socrates, [97d] this being the case, that knowledge should ever be more prized than right opinion, and why they should be two distinct and separate things.

Socrates

Well, do you know why it is that you wonder, or shall I tell you?

Meno

Please tell me.

Socrates

It is because you have not observed with attention the images of Daedalus. But perhaps there are none in your country.

Meno

What is the point of your remark?

Socrates

That if they are not fastened up they play truant and run away; but, if fastened, they stay where they are.

[97e]

Meno

Well, what of that?

Socrates

To possess one of his works which is let loose does not count for much in value; it will not stay with you any more than a runaway slave: but when fastened up it is worth a great deal, for his productions are very fine things And to what am I referring in all this? To true opinion. For these, so long as they stay with us, are a fine possession, [98a] and effect all that is good; but they do not care to stay for long, and run away out of the human soul, and thus are of no great value until one makes them fast with causal reasoning. And this process, friend Meno, is recollection, as in our previous talk we have agreed. But when once they are fastened, in the first place they turn into knowledge, and in the second, are abiding. And this is why knowledge is more prized than right opinion: the one transcends the other by its trammels.

Meno

Upon my word, Socrates, it seems to be very much as you say.

[98b] Socrates

And indeed I too speak as one who does not know but only conjectures: yet that there is a difference between right opinion and knowledge is not at all a conjecture with me but something I would particularly assert that I knew: there are not many things of which I would say that, but this one, at any rate, I will include among those that I know.

Meno

Yes, and you are right, Socrates, in so saying.

Socrates

Well, then, am I not right also in saying that true opinion leading the way renders the effect of each action as good as knowledge does?

Meno

There again, Socrates, I think you speak the truth.

[98c]

Socrates

So that right opinion will be no whit inferior to knowledge in worth or usefulness as regards our actions, nor will the man who has right opinion be inferior to him who has knowledge.

Meno

That is so.

Socrates

And you know that the good man has been admitted by us to be useful.

Meno

Yes.

Socrates

Since then it is not only because of knowledge that men will be good and useful to their country, where such men are to be found, but also on account of right opinion; and since neither of these two things--knowledge 98d] and true opinion--is a natural property of mankind, being acquired--or do you think that either of them is natural?

Meno

Not I.

Socrates

Then if they are not natural, good people cannot be good by nature either.

Meno

Of course not.

Socrates

And since they are not an effect of nature, we next considered whether virtue can be taught.

Meno

Yes.

Socrates

And we thought it teachable if virtue is wisdom?

Meno

Yes.

Socrates

And if teachable, it must be wisdom?

Meno

Certainly.

Socrates

And if there were teachers, it could be taught, [98e] but if there were none, it could not?

Meno

Quite so.

Socrates

But surely we acknowledged that it had no teachers?

Meno

That is true.

Socrates

Then we acknowledged it neither was taught nor was wisdom?

Meno

Certainly.

Socrates

But yet we admitted it was a good?

Meno

Yes.

Socrates

And that which guides rightly is useful and good?

Meno

Certainly.

Socrates
And that there are only two things--[99a] true opinion and knowledge--that guide rightly and a man guides rightly if he have these; for things that come about by chance do not occur through human guidance; but where a man is a guide to what is right we find these two things--true opinion and knowledge.

Meno

I agree.

Socrates

Well now, since virtue is not taught, we no longer take it to be knowledge?

Meno

Apparently not.

[99b]

Socrates

So of two good and useful things one has been rejected: knowledge cannot be our guide in political conduct.

Meno

I think not.

Socrates

Therefore it was not by any wisdom, nor because they were wise, that the sort of men we spoke of controlled their states--Themistocles and the rest of them, to whom our friend Anytus was referring a moment ago. For this reason it was that they were unable to make others like unto themselves--because their qualities were not an effect of knowledge.

Meno

The case is probably as you say, Socrates.

Socrates

And if not by knowledge, as the only alternative it must have been by good opinion. [99c] This is the means which statesmen employ for their direction of states, and they have nothing more to do with wisdom than soothsayers and diviners; for these people utter many a true thing when inspired, but have no knowledge of anything they say.

Meno

I daresay that is so.

Socrates

And may we, Meno, rightly call those men divine who, having no understanding, yet succeed in many a great deed and word?

Meno

Certainly.

Socrates

Then we shall be right in calling those divine of whom [99d] we spoke just now as soothsayers and prophets and all of the poetic turn; and especially we can say of the statesmen that they are divine and enraptured, as being inspired and possessed of God when they succeed in speaking many great things, while knowing nought of what they say.

Meno

Certainly.

Socrates

And the women too, I presume, Meno, call good men divine; and the Spartans, when they eulogize a good man, say--“He is a divine person.”

[99e]

Meno

And to all appearance, Socrates, they are right; though perhaps our friend Anytus may be annoyed at your statement.

Socrates

For my part, I care not. As for him, Meno, we will converse with him some other time. At the moment, if through all this discussion our queries and statements have been correct, virtue is found to be neither natural nor taught, but is imparted to us by a divine dispensation without understanding in those who receive it, [100a] unless there should be somebody among the statesmen capable of making a statesman of another. And if there should be any such, he might fairly be said to be among the living what Homer says Teiresias was among the dead--“He alone has comprehension; the rest are flitting shades.” In the same way he on earth, in respect of virtue, will be a real substance among shadows.

Meno, by Plato:
http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/1643

Apology, by Xenophon:
http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/etext98/aplgy10.txt

The Trial and Death of Socrates:
http://www.age-of-the-sage.org/greek/philosopher/trial_death_socrates.html

Socrates sought a singular virtue for human life. Plato identified four central virtues present in the ideal state or person. Aristotle holds that every moral virtue is the mean between vicious extremes.

"Crito, we owe a cock to Asclepius. Do pay it. Don't forget."