data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/319df/319dfb0e642964653355dd5262dbaf07f67e9d84" alt=""
"There is no such thing as a right to mercy, not for the animals, and not for us."
I read that statement, and felt as if I had been hit in the stomach. No mercy? No mercy! hey . . . maybe we have forgotten something when we talk of rights and virtues . . . mercy . . . how valuable is mercy . . . what is mercy . . . what about mercy is a vice . . .what about mercy is a virtue . . . is mercy an unalienable right . . . things that make you go hmm.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d07cf/d07cfa47eda1cd3946550ac4475e3d1f2557a0f6" alt=""
1 comment:
oh yeah, that statement came fromthe book:
Dominion: the Power of Man, the Suffering of Animals, and the Call to Mercy.
written by Matthew Scully, 2002, St. Martin's Press
Page 312 . . . on page 313 he says:
"Sometimes we speak of human rights and human dignity . . . as if these truths and natural laws have always been . . . advanced and refined through some Aristotlean inquiry calmly conducted across the centuries."
Post a Comment